Showing posts with label 2002. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2002. Show all posts

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Columbine: Understanding Why (A & E documentary - 2002)

A tale of two; a tale of many

By: JWBM

Back in April of '99, I was at the tail end of middle school—about to start the intimidating leap to high school—when the news came on about the horrendous shooting in Columbine, Colorado. I was nowhere near that state, but it still seemed to hit home after finding out it was just two suburban high school age seniors that massacred fellow classmates and injured many more. A year prior, one of my teachers had addressed a shooting at a middle school in Arkansas where two kids armed themselves to the teeth and then pulled the fire alarm to draw everyone out. Then after, we had to wait for the principal to confirm over the intercom that it was a legitimate drill till we could file out of the classroom safe and sound.

To hear of another the next year seemed a little much. Afterwards the fences went up, security got amped up, and everyone—adults and students alike—were touchy about anything said or done. Back then, not everything was as minute by minute as it is today with instant information at the touch of your fingertips. So, there were times where bits and pieces of the story were only heard and then passed on, which only added to the fear and misinformation that these two incidentally generated on that dark day. No one was in a playing around mood. Since, things have never been the same.

A group of forensic scientists called "Threat Assessment Group," or T.A.G.— that consists of a psychiatrist, violence prevention expert, former FBI profiler, a psychologist, and doctoral candidate—take on the task of a psychiatric autopsy of the two shooters. Being three years after the fact—not to mention the amount of litigation stemming to the parents, to the Sheriff's department, to the school—it was a tough sell to get interviews or even all of the evidence they needed. They approached nearly 200 people with calls and letters, but got only 19 on camera, and another 31 off. Not all of these you get to see. In fact, you only get to see a few brief interview segments in the documentary's under-an-hour run time. Some are vague at that and are only translated second hand from the group. The leader of the group—psychiatrist Park Dietz—developed 12 warning signs of mass murderers that they attempt to line up to the pair. The rest of the documentary focuses on the duo's motivations concerning why they stormed into Columbine High School with the intent of taking as many innocent lives as possible.

One interesting aspect talked about is their fascination with filming and documenting the entire planning process. They made home videos together, and then wrote in separate journals of their detailed thoughts outlining the plan. Being inspired by the Oklahoma City Bombings of a few years earlier, they knew that the media would pick up on it to dissect each shred of evidence. They'd be infamous. It goes to show that they were self-aware at what they were doing and the choices they were going to make. It wasn't an impulsive action that they dreamed up shortly beforehand. They mentally and physically prepared themselves for this. Predictably the media did run with it and there were copycats.

There were snippets of warning signs spread about that other people noticed as abnormal, but no single person put it all together that either of the two were deeply troubled enough to do anything on this scale. They kept their ideas in a closed loop. Similar to how a cult can operate with morally questionable practices and how people can go along with it. Each idea this pair had was repeated and reinforced enough that bad ideas became good ideas without an outside influence to offset their one track mind. Both were suicidal and filled with growing rage. They were described from an early age as being gifted in academics and over-achievers. They redirected their intelligence towards getting away with petty crimes at first, then planning a massacre instead of towards normal goals related to school, or even life after. Their attitude reflected that they were above it all and everyone else around them. They needed someone to blame for their inexplainable inner turmoil. Which, you can imagine, to a short-sighted 17/18 year old is their high school that they attended for the last 4 years. To them, this established a needed purpose and direction as misguided and morally questionable as that was. One could say, 'Guys, you'll be out in a month or two and be free to become bosses to spit on those that spit on you.' But to them, this was their World. The rest was too far off.

This short documentary shed light on some aspects, while other areas are applied to educated guesses. Some specials that have come out since have filled in other pieces of the puzzle a little better. It would ultimately take several books from several angles to unravel all of the intricacies involved. Though it was informational for its time to getting a loose grasp of the duo without being as reactionary as the initial reports in 1999. People were ready to point a finger at anyone and everyone. But I feel that is the problem with some of those involved beforehand. The T.A.G. group—while a little rocky with dissecting new forms of media such as "Doom" and "Natural Born Killers"—looked at it more clinically. They were not just self-destructive, but outwardly as well. They demanded respect, power, and control without actually setting up proper steps to earn those, or how to improve on themselves. Granted, saying that after the fact and off the cuff is wishful thinking. But it's ultimately what got them to walk down this dark path of no return in the first place. Unfortunately, some of the victims and witnesses will have to live with that for the rest of their lives, while others never got a chance.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

The 1972 Andes Survivors (2002)

A pep-me-up retelling

This was a 45 minute spot from a TV show called "Minute by Minute" that ran from 2001-2002 on A & E. This recounts the story of the Andes survivors, from before the original 45 passengers stepped onto Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 destined for Chile all the way up to when the 16 remaining made it back home from two members of their party trekking over the mountains from rescues being called off. This is a good starting point if you've never heard of the events before, or only in passing and want to know more in 45 minutes.

This was a snappy retelling with the intention of getting a viewer's heart racing to see what happens next, rather than being thoroughly informative despite the show's title of "Minute by Minute." If you've seen either the films "Supervivientes de los Andes" or "Alive" or even read one of the books, this isn't going to say very much that's new, except to possibly show them at the 30 year mark still alive and living life to the fullest is captivating in itself. I did find it interesting to note that they didn't go straight from Uruguay to Chile, which some of the other retellings show, but had a layover in Argentina due to the weather conditions, but then proceeded forward the next day anyway. The meat of what they went through is here (no pun intended) with quick edits and clipped narration with a steady flow of information to get charged by. Though for an emotional context, this doesn't always leave room for the characters to truly open up, since a specific person never says more than a few lines at a time, rather than to give a brief and succinct factual version of their account with frequent time lines displayed on the screen for that "Minute by Minute" touch that makes it feel too planned and not translate that everyday was unsure as the last.

This only gets a few perspectives of the account. It has spoken English interviews with Roberto Canessa, Canessa's girlfriend Laura Surraco, Fernando "Nando" Parrado, Carlitos Paez, Coche Inciarte and Inciarte's fiancee Soledad Gonzalez. Dubbed English with General Jorge Massa (Chilean Air Force), Carlitos's father, Father Andres Rojas and Dr. Jose Ausin (first doctor to examine them). There is still enthusiasm to tell their tale even after 30 years at this point. Though this isn't a story that can be effectively told in a short time frame, since major events don't happen one after the other. They went through 72 intense days with an array of emotions to battle, one of them being that they didn't know if they would live or die tomorrow or after going to sleep. What actually happened to them is more a slower crawl till the light at the end of the tunnel, than the usual survival in the wilderness story where you can put emotion on the back burner to stay alive. On the other hand, for a viewer who gets touched fairly easily, the tone here is kept somewhat upbeat and hopeful in most areas, despite what the survivors have stated they felt on other days in different interviews. I guess that shows what the power of editing can do.

Rating: 6.5/10

Link: IMDB, video link Youtube

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Unfaithful (2002)

Where's your partner right now?

Would you jump at the chance of having a sex-based fling on the side if your romance was dwindling with your established spouse? That's just what UK director Adrian Lyne stirred up heated conversations about with his go at another erotic thriller back in 2002. "Indecent Proposal" gave away the million dollar question with feelings of resentment, "Lolita" hinted at regressive middle aged men and impulsive nymphets, and "Unfaithful" looks at the human relationship again this time through the eyes of the average couple with one kid, house and their priorities in order. Quite possibly your everything's-fine neighbor or the employee-of-the-month person next to you at work.

Little did you know that being a mature, hard-working individual wasn't always enough, but letting out the inner Casanova or Don Juan once in a while, with irresistible accent and all, to spice up your unspontaneous life might be, or possibly might not be, all it takes. Though that's just what temptations and deeper, reflective feelings are all about: sometimes they're impossible to resist and can eventually turn self-destructive if left unchecked. Can I go through with it? Is this what I really want? What if I get caught? All questions that might or might not go through one's head depending on which road is chosen. It's a can of worms that some leave unopened, while others attempt to handle the growing mess from their in-the-now, overpowering desires.

"Unfaithful" makes you feel like you're there as you get to see little, realistic details that are usually glossed over in the typical hot and steamy stimulating film. It also takes on different angles about the provoking question. Essentially it isn't a thunder-storming morality story where everything is shadowed and grim with hovering dark clouds wherever it roams. A viewer gets a tone from a drama on the surface but also tads of light fun and humor at points, though most importantly real characters reveal themselves during the expertly paced and shot film that's capable of hinting at hidden meanings even when words aren't spoken.

Rating: 9/10

Director: Adrian Lyne (Nine 1/2 Weeks, Fatal Attraction, Jacob's Ladder)
Stars: Richard Gere, Diane Lane, Oliver Martinez
Link: IMDB